I know, because I've measured it before, that water that I find hot to the touch is 43°C. It's pretty chilly out at the moment, so let's say the incoming main is 5°C and round it up to 45° for washing-up temperature (all approximations here err on the side of increasing energy usage in my test). Since water is very reliable in how much energy it requires to heat up, I can calculate that this would take 256 Watt hours of energy to heat, or just over a quarter of a kWh.
I then needed to know how much washing up I'd achieved. One
loadfor me is until either the draining rack is full or the water is too dirty to wash any more. This tends to occur at roughly the same time, though I do more rinsing under the tap towards the end of the load, as the water gets dirtier. I noted down what I'd washed:-
- 4 glasses
- 2 mugs
- 1 tin can and 1 jam jar
- 1 measuring jug (not the one I used for bailing)
- 5 plates
- 3 bowls and a basin
- pestle and mortar
- 2 saucepans
- 2 mixing bowls
- 2 plastic trays that fruit came in, for recycling
- 15 items of cutlery
See those pans on the windowsill behind? I used the dirty water from this load to soak them so they'll be easier to wash when I get round to them. I do that.
Having noted down the details of my own washing up, I then needed to find appropriate figures for comparison with dishwashers. The
factthat dishwashers are more efficient seems to come mainly from a study conducted at Bonn University, comparing many people actually washing up with dishwashers doing the same work. When I looked for this study I was pleased to find that they've done a follow-up with smaller loads (the original study was a full twelve place settings in one go):
Our intention was to simulate the dishwashing situation in a two-person household,excellent!
... in which two place settings are used and cleaned three times per dayah, I'm not sure I wash up that frequently,
... and four additional items are soiled heavily in the food preparation processes and are washed separately.Do you wash up the pans separately? Still, we should be getting close to comparable figures.
I looked at the details of the study. One place setting consists of:-
- a soup plate
- a dinner plate
- a dessert dish
- a cup
- a saucer
- a serving dish
- a glass
- a fork, a knife, a soup spoon, a teaspoon, a dessert spoon
So that would be a three course meal with coffee to follow, three times a day?? OK, never mind how unrealistic this is. I now have some details to work with. How does my load of washing up map onto this test load?
two place settings plus pans | my washing up |
---|---|
2 soup plates; 2 dessert dishes | 3 bowls and a basin |
2 dinner plates; 2 saucers; 2 serving dishes | 5 plates |
2 cups | 2 mugs |
2 glasses | 4 glasses |
10 items of cutlery | 15 items of cutlery |
4 pans/casserole dishes | 2 pans; 2 mixing bowls |
not included | pestle and mortar |
not included | measuring jug |
not included | tin can; jam jar; plastic trays |
It looks like my load of washing up was slightly more than one of their two-place-setting loads plus their food preparation load. Let's say they're roughly the same - how do the figures compare with their hand washers?
The water and energy measurements show a very wide distribution of consumption values, ranging from four to 90 l and from 0.03 kWh up to 2.6 kWh for washing a pair of place settings. Washing four heavily soiled cooking items required slightly more energy and water than two place settings.I used 5.5 l and 0.26 kWh for a pair of place settings plus four cooking items. For water consumption I am off their scale, and I'm way down there for energy consumption too (apparently someone was happy to wash up in cold water).
How about the machines? We need to take account of the fact that you'd put more in a machine than my one
loaddone by hand. I estimate that you'd get two to three times as much in a dishwasher, and their test used six place settings (three times as many as one of their hand-wash loads) plus the pots and pans. I think multiplying my usage by 2.5 gives a fair basis for comparison, so that's about 14 litres and 0.64 kWh. Their machines used 83 litres.
With regard to energy consumption (Fig. 8), the tendencies are similar, but the difference between manual and automatic dishwashing is not as pronounced.They don't even report the figures, but examination of their Figure 8 shows almost identical energy consumption for the 6 place setting plus pots and pans; approx. 1.8 kWh.
As I'd suspected, the current emphasis on low water consumption serves to distract from high power usage. When compared with my own washing up, as best I can, I am far more efficient than a machine in both water and energy consumption.
I finish by noting a sentence from their acknowledgements section:
Thanks are due to our four European manufacturers of dishwashing machines (Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte, Electrolux, Merloni Elettrodomestici and Arcelik) for supporting this study.
Well, I think you're probably right in terms of energy use, but I fear I have become a total dishwasher convert since I discovered the secret to the no pre-rinse system (aka: buy the right detergent.) It saves me at least an hour a day, and incalculable amounts of emotional energy. So much for being "eco!" :-)
ReplyDeleteThe study did include time spent, too, and unsurprisingly the machines won by a huge margin on that count. I wonder what the environmental impact is of conserving emotional energy? ;-)
DeleteIt's good to hear from you. I hope life's treating you well.
Have to laugh at that last sentence- my husband always says what studies will prove will depend on who pays for the research.
ReplyDeleteI had similar suspicions- nice to know I'm not alone (and also correct!)
At first glance, this looks like a fairly decent study. It's only on close reading that it starts to look a bit odd. Presenting a typical day's washing up as four separate sessions - one after each meal plus pans separately - seems a bit excessive, whatever their survey may have said (If you ask people how often they wash up, how many people who say, "After each meal," actually do? Adding two options more frequent than this will skew the results in this direction).
DeleteThere's a complete lack of stats and a blatant misrepresentation of the energy consumption results, but what I'm really curious about is, what exactly were their instructions to participants and how did they wash? Maybe some people really do leave the hot tap running the whole time they're washing up - there seems to have been at least one that did that in this study - but that's shockingly wasteful. This hardly makes the case for using dishwashers - it makes a case for people to THINK just a little bit.
What resources are put into making a dishwasher? (and running the dishwasher factory and the supply chain to supply dishwasher sales outlets?) Is the dishwasher user seviceable i.e. how easy is it to repair?
ReplyDeleteIMHO it's 'Greenwash' to only look at water and detergent use!
DeleteI would love to believe that a dishwasher is more efficient, but secretly know it isn't. I don't want to spend ages doing the washing up either, so tend to concentrate my energies on reducing the amount I generate. I wash up once a day and things like the chopping board & chopping knife are used at lunch and then reused at dinner. Being vegetarian helps - no cross-contamination issues! I use one glass a day, one mug etc.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure this would disgust some people, but it works for me and I haven't died yet.
We practise similar washing up reduction strategies in this house, too. e.g. If a plate only has breadcrumbs on it they're easy enough to dust off before using it for another slice of bread.
DeleteMy understanding was that that study compared dishes washed to German standards - Brits don't do the washing up anything like as thoroughly...
ReplyDeleteWe save some washing up by having our own mugs (guarded carefully from interlopers) and reusing them through the day. Once you have to wash everything by hand, you become a lot less cavalier about dirtying another plate etc.
They made quite a point of how international their washer-uppers were, though I didn't see British included in the list of nationalities. Evidently we're less thorough than not just Germans, but most Europeans!
ReplyDelete